主要業績


著書

山岸侯彦(2002). 推論と意思決定. 都築誉史 (編), 認知科学 パースペクティブ (pp. 133-153). 東京: 信山社.


学術論文

リスク認知

Yamagishi, K. (1994). Consistencies and biases in risk perception: II. Individual subjects' performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 659-663.

Yamagishi, K. (1994). Consistencies and biases in risk perception: I. Anchoring process and response-range effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 651-656.

Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495-506. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K., Kitano, M., Morinaga, E., Iwamura, T., Matsubara, T., & Nagae, N. (1999). Perception of dioxin and other risks in Japan: Replication and extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 1009-1018.


意思決定

Yamagishi, K. (1996). Strength of preference and effects of valence in the domains of gains and losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 290-306. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K., & Miyamoto, J. M. (1996). Asymmetries in strength of preference: A focus shift model of valence effects in difference judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 493-509. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K. (2002). Effects of valence and framing in decision making: Assessing decision makers' perceived domains of choice. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 208-226. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K. (2003). Effects of Valence and Framing in Decision Making II: Estimating Subjective Weighting. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 173-187. (PDF)


確率判断

Yamagishi, K. (1997). Upward versus downward anchoring in frequency judgments of social facts. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 124-129. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495-506. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K. (2002). Proximity, Compatibility, and Noncomplementarity in Subjective Probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 136-155. (PDF)

Yamagishi, K. (2003). Facilitating Normative Judgments of Conditional Probability: Frequency or Nested Sets? Experimental Psychology, 50, 97-106. (PDF)




Topに戻る